top of page

The
Bioplanning
Institute

A non-profit committed to advancing biomimetic urban planning

We are doubling the land coverage of cities in the next 20 years.

we need to shift to an era of ecological
community-oriented
urban planning.

plan_animation.gif

What if it is possible...

for this to be a geometrical shift?

What if we build communities just like cells do, similar to other living organisms?

What if we design buildings that follow hill formation and shaped by the path of the sun?

We can achieve

social connectivity

human

empathy

ecological

harmony

by simply shifting the urban geometry

biomimetic cellular layout

+

parabolic massing logic

in the center of every community is a vibrant green public space while density is the same

Ecological, climate, economic and socio-cultural factors affect the layout.

Screenshot 2024-07-30 at 10.06.57 AM copy.png

The cellular layout, including the size of the communities, building massing, shape, and size, is adaptable to factors such as climate zone, terrain, biomass, wind flow, sea level rise, culture, and other considerations.

Bioplanning Benefits.

how is it better?

The Bioplanning approach is a revolutionary and holistic biomimetic urban planning strategy. These what bioplanned communities bring:

benefits

01

increase in happiness and public health because of the access to nature for every community.

How do we know?

Access to nature significantly enhances public health and happiness. Studies demonstrate that contact with natural environments reduces stress, improves mental health, and increases overall well-being. These benefits are evident across different demographics, highlighting the universal positive impact of green spaces and natural areas (Van den Bosch & Sang, 2017), (Maller et al., 2006).

02

greater walkability and redial access to life necessity because of separation of pedestrian and vehicle paths. side effect: carbon footprint reduction.

How do we know?

Separating vehicle circulation from pedestrian paths can significantly increase walkability in urban environments. Studies indicate that such separation enhances pedestrian safety, comfort, and overall satisfaction by reducing conflicts with vehicles and providing dedicated, well-designed spaces for walking. This approach also promotes more walking trips, contributing to better health and environmental outcomes (Suminar & Kusumaningrum, 2022), (Zhao et al., 2020), (Lee et al., 2021).

03

increase in biodiversity and air quality and carbon emissions due to allocation of 27% of coverage to natural area without compromsing on density. at all.

How do we know?

Increasing coverage of urban environments dedicated to natural areas significantly enhances biodiversity, air quality, and reduces carbon emissions. Studies show that urban forests and green spaces not only sequester carbon and reduce atmospheric pollutants but also improve urban residents' well-being by providing cleaner air and natural habitats for diverse species (Bytnerowicz et al., 2008), (Ferrari et al., 2017), (Nowak, 1993).

16 conflict points

3 conflict points

04

reduction in collisions, from 16 conflict points to 3, due to safer three-way intersection everywhere. 

How do we know?

Converting traditional intersections to three-way intersections and roundabouts can significantly reduce collisions. Research shows that these changes lead to decreased severe crashes and improved overall traffic safety. Roundabouts, in particular, are associated with substantial reductions in injury and fatal crashes due to their design, which slows down vehicles and reduces conflict points (Burdett et al., 2016), (Polders et al., 2015), (Retting et al., 2001).

05

better overall light and views due to parabolic shapes of the buildings. 

According the studies conducted by China State Construction

06

How do we know?

Increasing public spaces and green areas can significantly reduce crime and violence. Studies indicate that well-maintained green spaces can enhance social interaction, improve mental health, and foster community cohesion, leading to a decrease in violent and property crimes (Shepley et al., 2019), (Cerdá et al., 2018), (Sypion, 2023).

07

significant increase in soil and vegetation help with floods and stormwater management.

boost in safety, crime and violence reduction due to increase and public spaces and increase in green areas.

How do we know?

Increasing soil and vegetation can significantly aid in coping with floods and stormwater management. Research highlights the effectiveness of green infrastructure, soil amendments, and vegetative practices in enhancing infiltration, reducing runoff, and improving water quality. These practices can mitigate flood risks and improve stormwater management outcomes (Sharma & Malaviya, 2021), (Cadavid & Ando, 2013), (Rivers et al., 2020).

How do we know?

Reducing carbon emissions through the reduction of road infrastructure is a critical strategy for mitigating climate change. Studies indicate that optimizing road infrastructure, implementing advanced vehicle technologies, and improving construction practices can significantly lower carbon emissions associated with road networks (Xie et al., 2017), (Liu et al., 2021), (Keijzer et al., 2015).

massive cut in carbon emissions due to reduction in road infrastructure (only 16% of total coverage) and faster construction time.

08

09

rapid and optimized construction operations by using modular construction methods.

How do we know?

Optimizing and reducing the construction time using modular structures can be significantly achieved through integrated design processes, advanced optimization models, and simulation methods. Research highlights the importance of these methodologies in enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of modular construction projects (Hyun et al., 2020), (Almashaqbeh & El-Rayes, 2021), (Mohsen et al., 2008).

10

According the studies conducted by Buro Happold

40% less energy consumption for heating and cooling and enhance of indoor and outdoor thermal comfort due to shift in orientation.

greater resiliency and stability due to parabolic structural design and adaptability in foundation.

11

How do we know?

The stability of parabolic buildings, especially those with parabolic arches, is influenced by rise-to-span ratios, load distribution, material properties, and environmental conditions. Research highlights the importance of computational methods like FEM and parametric analyses in predicting and enhancing their stability (Hu et al., 2020), (Chand et al., 2019), (Shao-peng, 2013), (Sophianopoulos & Michaltsos, 2003), (Kampas et al., 2020), (Sabale & Gopal, 2018)

How do we know?

Increasing areas dedicated to nature and vegetation in urban settings significantly reduces noise pollution. Studies demonstrate that natural vegetation acts as an effective sound barrier, reducing noise levels by absorbing and blocking sound waves. This not only improves the urban soundscape but also enhances the well-being of residents by creating quieter environments (Biocca et al., 2019), (Ow & Ghosh, 2017), (Schäffer et al., 2020).

12

significant reduction in noise pollution due to the massive increase in areas dedicated to nature and vegetation.

Based on comprehensive studies by Buro Happold and China State Construction Company and showcase the benefits of cellular layout consisted of SuperCells, biomimetic urban blocks. Additionally, our curated library of studies highlights the benefits of biomimetic urban planning.

Bibliography Increase in happiness and public health due to access to nature References Van den Bosch, M., & Sang, Å. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health - A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research, 158, 373-384. Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., & St Leger, L. S. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people: 'contact with nature' as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 45-54. Cox, D., Shanahan, D. F., Hudson, H. L., Fuller, R., & Gaston, K. (2018). The impact of urbanisation on nature dose and the implications for human health. Landscape and Urban Planning. Buckley, R. (2020). Nature tourism and mental health: parks, happiness, and causation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28, 1409-1424. Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Sia, A., Tam, W., Fogel, A., Kua, E., Khoo, K., & Ho, R. (2020). Nature-based activities improve the well-being of older adults. Scientific Reports, 10. Veenhoven, R. (2008). Healthy happiness: effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 449-469. Ward Thompson, C., Elizalde, A., Cummins, S., Leyland, A., Botha, W., Briggs, A., Tilley, S., Oliveira, E. S. de, Roe, J., Aspinall, P., & Mitchell, R. (2019). Enhancing Health Through Access to Nature: How Effective are Interventions in Woodlands in Deprived Urban Communities? A Quasi-experimental Study in Scotland, UK. Sustainability, 11. Shanahan, D. F., Lin, B., Bush, R., Gaston, K., Dean, J., Barber, E., & Fuller, R. (2015). Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), 470-477. Liu, H., Ren, H., Remme, R., Nong, H., & Sui, C. (2021). The effect of urban nature exposure on mental health—a case study of Guangzhou. Journal of Cleaner Production. Kolokotsa, D., Lilli, A., Lilli, M. A., & Nikolaidis, N. P. (2020). On the impact of nature-based solutions on citizens’ health & well being. Energy and Buildings, 229, 110527. Nilsson, K., Bentsen, P., Grahn, P., & Mygind, L. (2019). What is the scientific evidence with regard to the effects of forests, trees on human health and well-being? Sante Publique, S1 HS, 219-240. Richardson, M., & McEwan, K. (2018). 30 Days Wild and the Relationships Between Engagement With Nature’s Beauty, Nature Connectedness and Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. James, P., Tzoulas, K., & Dennis, M. (2020). Nature’s Contribution to Health and Wellbeing in the City. Annerstedt van den Bosch, M., Östergren, P., Grahn, P., Skärbäck, E., & Währborg, P. (2015). Moving to Serene Nature May Prevent Poor Mental Health—Results from a Swedish Longitudinal Cohort Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 7974-7989. Rugel, E., Carpiano, R., Henderson, S., & Brauer, M. (2019). Exposure to natural space, sense of community belonging, and adverse mental health outcomes across an urban region. Environmental Research, 171, 365-377. Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K., & Fuller, R. (2013). What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 913-935. Kim, D., & Jin, J. (2018). Does happiness data say urban parks are worth it? Landscape and Urban Planning Stability of parabolic buildings References Hu, Q., Liu, C., Yuan, C., Wang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2020). Experimental Investigation into In-plane Stability of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Parabolic Arches Under Five-Point Concentrated Loads. International Journal of Steel Structures, 20, 2038-2050. Chand, R., Behera, P. K., Pradhan, M., & Dash, P. (2019). Parametric Stability Analysis of a Parabolic-Tapered Rotating Beam Under Variable Temperature Grade. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 7, 23-31. Shao-peng, L. (2013). Stability and Dynamic Analysis of Parabolic Arch Structure Based on Finite Element Method. Machinery Design and Manufacture. Sophianopoulos, D., & Michaltsos, G. (2003). Analytical Treatment of In-Plane Parametrically Excited Undamped Vibrations of Simply Supported Parabolic Arches. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 125, 73-79. Kampas, G., Kalapodis, N. A., McLean, T., & Málaga‐Chuquitaype, C. (2020). Limit-state analysis of parabolic arches subjected to inertial loading in different gravitational fields using a variational formulation. Engineering Structures. Sabale, A., & Gopal, K. (2018). Nonlinear In-Plane Stability of Deep Parabolic Arches Using Geometrically Exact Beam Theory. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 18, 1850006. Construction optimization using modular structures References Hyun, H., Kim, H., Lee, H., Park, M., & Lee, J. (2020). Integrated Design Process for Modular Construction Projects to Reduce Rework. Sustainability, 12, 530. Almashaqbeh, M., & El-Rayes, K. (2021). Optimizing the modularization of floor plans in modular construction projects. Journal of Building Engineering, 215, 92-107. Mohsen, O. M., Knytl, P. J., Abdulaal, B., Olearczyk, J., & Al-Hussein, M. (2008). Simulation of modular building construction. 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, 2471-2478. Isaac, S., Bock, T., & Stoliar, Y. (2014). A New Approach to Building Design Modularization. Procedia Engineering, 85, 274-282. Ritter, C., & Al-Hussein, M. (2017). Planning of modular construction manufacturing plant layouts using non-linear optimization. Journal of Modular Construction. Zheng, Z., Li, Y., & Torres, J. (2022). An integrated method of automated layout design and optimization for modular construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. Zawidzki, M., & Jankowski, L. (2019). Multiobjective optimization of modular structures: Weight versus geometric versatility in a Truss‐Z system. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 34, 1026-1040. Castorani, V., Cicconi, P., Germani, M., Bondi, S., Marronaro, M. G., & Coppolaro, S. (2018). A Framework to Support the Optimization of Modularized Oil and Gas Structures. Volume 2B: 44th Design Automation Conference. Tyburec, M., Zeman, J., Doškář, M., & Kružík, M. (2020). Modular-topology optimization with Wang tilings: an application to truss structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 63, 1099-1117. Bhatia, A. P. S., Han, S., & Moselhi, O. (2022). A simulation-based statistical method for planning modular construction manufacturing. J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 27, 130-144. Lacey, A., Chen, W., Hao, H., & Bi, K. (2018). Structural response of modular buildings – An overview. Journal of Building Engineering, 16, 45-56. Reduction in carbon emissions due to cut in road infrastructure References Xie, R., Fang, J., & Liu, C. (2017). The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions. Applied Energy, 196, 199-207. Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Lyu, P., Hu, S., Yang, L., & Gao, G. (2021). Rethinking the carbon dioxide emissions of road sector: Integrating advanced vehicle technologies and construction supply chains mitigation options under decarbonization plans. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128769. Keijzer, E., Leegwater, G., Vos-Effting, S. D., & Wit, M. D. (2015). Carbon footprint comparison of innovative techniques in the construction and maintenance of road infrastructure in The Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 218-225. Kytzia, S., & Brändli, H. (2022). Reducing the carbon footprint of municipal infrastructures. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1078. Sobrino, N., & Monzón, A. (2018). Towards Low-Carbon Interurban Road Strategies: Identifying Hot Spots Road Corridors in Spain. Sustainability. Kumar, H., & Goyal, M. (2018). Carbon Footprint of Roads: A Literature Review. International journal of engineering research and technology, 6. Wang, Z., Wiedenhofer, D., Stephan, A., Perrotti, D., Van den bergh, W., & Cao, Z. (2023). High-Resolution Mapping of Material Stocks in Belgian Road Infrastructure: Material Efficiency Patterns, Material Recycling Potentials, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Opportunities. Environmental science & technology. Cavallaro, F., Giaretta, F., & Nocera, S. (2016). The potential of road pricing schemes to reduce carbon emissions. Transport Policy, 52, 345-353. Luo, S., & Yuan, Y. (2023). The Path to Low Carbon: The Impact of Network Infrastructure Construction on Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction. Sustainability, 15, 3683. Santero, N., Loijos, A., & Ochsendorf, J. (2013). Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Opportunities for Concrete Pavements. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17. Januarisma, V., & Garniwa, I. (2020). The estimation of carbon emission on the result of road transportation reallocation. E3S Web of Conferences, 211. Barrington-Leigh, C., & Millard‐Ball, A. (2017). More connected urban roads reduce US GHG emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 12. Sun, D., Zeng, S., Lin, H., Meng, X., & Yu, B. (2019). Can transportation infrastructure pave a green way? A city-level examination in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 208-216. Handayani, F. S., Pramesti, F. P., Wibowo, M., & Setyawan, A. (2019). Estimating and Reducing the Release of Greenhouse Gases in Local Road Pavement Constructions. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9, 9705. Dong, J., Li, Y., Li, W., & Liu, S. (2022). CO2 Emission Reduction Potential of Road Transport to Achieve Carbon Neutrality in China. Sustainability, 14, 5454. Reger, D., Madanat, S., & Horvath, A. (2015). The effect of agency budgets on minimizing greenhouse gas emissions from road rehabilitation policies. Environmental Research Letters, 10. Lyu, Y., Ji, Z., Liang, H., Wang, T., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Has Information Infrastructure Reduced Carbon Emissions?—Evidence from Panel Data Analysis of Chinese Cities. Buildings, 12, 619. Newman, P., Hargroves, K., Desha, C., Whistler, L., Farr, A., Beauson, J., Surawski, L., & Matan, A. (2011). The future of roads: Reducing environmental pressures and the management of carbon. Science & Engineering Faculty. Flood management by increasing soil and vegetation References Sharma, R., & Malaviya, P. (2021). Management of stormwater pollution using green infrastructure: The role of rain gardens. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8. Cadavid, C. L., & Ando, A. W. (2013). Valuing preferences over stormwater management outcomes including improved hydrologic function. Water Resources Research, 49, 4114-4125. Rivers, E. N., Heitman, J., McLaughlin, R., & Howard, A. (2020). Reducing roadside runoff: Tillage and compost improve stormwater mitigation in urban soils. Journal of environmental management, 111732. Bartens, J., Day, S., Harris, J. R., Dove, J., & Wynn, T. (2008). Can urban tree roots improve infiltration through compacted subsoils for stormwater management? Journal of environmental quality, 37(6), 2048-2057. Pour, S. H., Wahab, A. K. A., Shahid, S., Asaduzzaman, M., & Dewan, A. (2020). Low impact development techniques to mitigate the impacts of climate-change-induced urban floods: Current trends, issues and challenges. Sustainable Cities and Society, 62, 102373. Slavich, P., Walker, G., Jolly, I., Hatton, T., & Dawes, W. (1999). Dynamics of Eucalyptus largiflorens growth and water use in response to modified watertable and flooding regimes on a saline floodplain. Agricultural Water Management, 39, 245-264. Collins, S., Verhoef, A., Mansour, M., Jackson, C., Short, C., & Macdonald, D. (2023). Modelling the effectiveness of land‐based natural flood management in a large, permeable catchment. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 16. Cornelis, W., Waweru, G., & Araya, T. (2019). Building Resilience Against Drought and Floods: The Soil-Water Management Perspective. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Kays, B. L., McLaughlin, R., Heitman, J., Mohammadshirazi, F., & Brown, V. (2015). Amending Soils for Enhanced Infiltration of Stormwater. Water Resources Management. Brudler, S., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Hauschild, M., & Rygaard, M. (2016). Life cycle assessment of stormwater management in the context of climate change adaptation. Water research, 106, 394-404. Asiedu, J. (2018). Assessing the Threat of Erosion to Nature-Based Interventions for Stormwater Management and Flood Control in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 19, 1-13. Pagliacci, F., Defrancesco, E., Bettella, F., & D'Agostino, V. (2020). Mitigation of Urban Pluvial Flooding: What Drives Residents’ Willingness to Implement Green or Grey Stormwater Infrastructures on Their Property? Water. Lamond, J., Rose, C., & Booth, C. (2015). Evidence for improved urban flood resilience by sustainable drainage retrofit. Urban Drainage and Flood Control. Olson, N., Gulliver, J., Nieber, J., & Kayhanian, M. (2013). Remediation to improve infiltration into compact soils. Journal of environmental management, 117, 85-95. Sieker, F. (2000). Investigations of the Effects of On-Site Stormwater Management Measures in Urban and Agricultural Areas on Floods. Environmental Management. Misni, A., & Amir Shahfuddin, N. A. F. (2017). Low-impact development: Minimising stormwater runoff in a case study of section 13, Shah Alam, Malaysia. Water Resources Management, 220, 205-215. Berendse, F., Ruijven, J., Jongejans, E., & Keesstra, S. (2015). Loss of Plant Species Diversity Reduces Soil Erosion Resistance. Ecosystems, 18, 881-888. Safety by increasing public spaces References Shepley, M., Sachs, N. A., Sadatsafavi, H., Fournier, C., & Peditto, K. (2019). The Impact of Green Space on Violent Crime in Urban Environments: An Evidence Synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16. Cerdá, M., Tracy, M., & Keyes, K. (2018). Reducing Urban Violence: A Contrast of Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches. Epidemiology, 29, 142-150. Sypion, N. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Green Areas on Crime Rates in Urban Environments. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL. Bogar, S., & Beyer, K. (2016). Green Space, Violence, and Crime. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17, 160-171. Locke, D., Han, S., Kondo, M. C., Murphy-Dunning, C., & Cox, M. (2017). Did community greening reduce crime? Evidence from New Haven, CT, 1996-2007. Landscape and Urban Planning, 161, 72-79. Mancus, G. C., Cimino, A., Hasan, M. Z., Campbell, J., Sharps, P., Winch, P., Tsuyuki, K., & Stockman, J. (2021). Greenness and the Potential Resilience to Sexual Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37, NP17344-NP17368. Sanciangco, J. C., Breetzke, G., Lin, Z., Wang, Y. H., Clevenger, K. A., & Pearson, A. (2021). The Relationship Between City “Greenness” and Homicide in the US: Evidence Over a 30-Year Period. Environment and Behavior, 54, 538-571. Mancus, G. C., & Campbell, J. (2018). Integrative Review of the Intersection of Green Space and Neighborhood Violence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50, 117-125. Kondo, M. C., Hohl, B. C., Han, S., & Branas, C. (2016). Effects of greening and community reuse of vacant lots on crime. Urban Studies, 53, 3279-3295. Garvin, E. C., Cannuscio, C., & Branas, C. (2012). Greening vacant lots to reduce violent crime: a randomised controlled trial. Injury Prevention, 19, 198-203. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House. Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces. Travel time optimization and increase in safety by using roundabouts References Burdett, B., Alsghan, I., Chiu, L., Bill, A. R., & Noyce, D. (2016). Analysis of Rear-End Collisions at Roundabout Approaches. Transportation Research Record, 2585, 29-38. Burdett, B., Bill, A., & Noyce, D. (2017). Evaluation of Roundabout-Related Single-Vehicle Crashes. Transportation Research Record, 2637, 17-26. Pauca, O., & Caruntu, C. (2020). Travel Time Minimization at Roundabouts for Connected and Automated Vehicles. 2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 1, 905-910. Polders, E., Daniels, S., Casters, W., & Brijs, T. (2015). Identifying Crash Patterns on Roundabouts. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16, 202-207. Retting, R., Persaud, B., Gårder, P., & Lord, D. (2001). Crash and injury reduction following installation of roundabouts in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 91(4), 628-631. Elvik, R. (2003). Effects on Road Safety of Converting Intersections to Roundabouts: Review of Evidence from Non-U.S. Studies. Transportation Research Record, 1847, 1-10. Zhao, S., Khattak, A., & Thompson, E. (2015). Safety and Economic Assessment of Converting Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections to Roundabouts on High Speed Rural Highways. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 54, 131-144. Johnson, M. T. (2023). Effects of Phi and View Angle Geometric Principles on Safety of Multi-Lane Roundabouts. Transportation Research Record, 2677, 362-371. Isebrands, H. N., Hallmark, S., & Hawkins, N. (2014). Effects of Approach Speed at Rural High-Speed Intersections. Transportation Research Record, 2402, 67-77. Fakirah, M., Leng, S., Chen, X., & Zhou, J. (2020). Visible light communication-based traffic control of autonomous vehicles at multi-lane roundabouts. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2020, 1-14. Benefits of urban green spaces: Increase in biodiversity, improvements of air quality, reduction of carbon emissions References Bytnerowicz, A., Arbaugh, M., Fenn, M., Gimeno, B., & Paoletti, E. (2008). Introduction: Forests under anthropogenic pressure--effects of air pollution, climate change and urban development. Environmental Pollution, 155(3), 389-90. Ferrari, B., Corona, P., Mancini, L. D., Salvati, R., & Barbati, A. (2017). Taking the pulse of forest plantations success in peri-urban environments through continuous inventory. New Forests, 48, 527-545. Nowak, D. (1993). Atmospheric Carbon Reduction by Urban Trees. Journal of Environmental Management, 37, 207-217. Zhu, Z., Wang, G., & Dong, J. (2019). Correlation Analysis between Land Use/Cover Change and Air Pollutants—A Case Study in Wuyishan City. Energies. Endreny, T., Santagata, R., Perna, A., Stefano, C., Rallo, R. F., & Ulgiati, S. (2017). Implementing and managing urban forests: A much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing. Ecological Modelling, 360, 328-335. Qin, B., & Wu, J. (2015). Does urban concentration mitigate CO2 emissions? Evidence from China 1998–2008. China Economic Review, 35, 220-231. Adams, S., Boateng, E., & Acheampong, A. (2020). Transport energy consumption and environmental quality: Does urbanization matter? The Science of the Total Environment, 744, 140617. Seto, K., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16083-16088. Douglas, A. N. J., Irga, P., & Torpy, F. (2019). Determining broad scale associations between air pollutants and urban forestry: A novel multifaceted methodological approach. Environmental Pollution, 247, 474-481. Lee, C. (2019). Impacts of urban form on air quality: Emissions on the road and concentrations in the US metropolitan areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 192-202. Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P., & Sanesi, G. (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221-228. Increase in walkability as a result of separation pedestrian paths and vehicle circulation References Suminar, L., & Kusumaningrum, L. (2022). Application of Walkability Principles of Pedestrian Path in Supporting the Green City Concept (Case of Parasamya Street Corridor, Sleman Regency). INERSIA lnformasi dan Ekspose Hasil Riset Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur. Zhao, J., Sun, G., & Webster, C. (2020). Walkability scoring: Why and how does a three-dimensional pedestrian network matter? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48, 2418-2435. Lee, S., Han, M., Rhee, K., & Bae, B. (2021). Identification of Factors Affecting Pedestrian Satisfaction toward Land Use and Street Type. Sustainability. Blecic, I., Congiu, T., & Fancello, G. (2017). Walking across rural-urban fringe: the hindering effect of intersections. Shawket, I. M., & Shaban, R. (2023). Unveiling the influence of urban revitalization on pedestrian flow and conduct: a case study in New Cairo, Egypt. HBRC Journal, 19, 141-159. Biswas, S., & Roychowdhury, K. (2022). Perception of the Impact of Heavy Vehicle Movement on Walkability in Krishnanagar Municipality, India. GIS Ostrava 2022 Earth Observation for Smart City and Smart Region. Bellizzi, M. G. (2022). A stated preference survey for evaluating pedestrians’ expectations on walkways. Blecic, I., Canu, D., Cecchini, A., Congiu, T., & Fancello, G. (2017). Walkability and Street Intersections in Rural-Urban Fringes: A Decision Aiding Evaluation Procedure. Sustainability, 9, 1-19. Leden, L. (2002). Pedestrian risk decrease with pedestrian flow. A case study based on data from signalized intersections in Hamilton, Ontario. Accident; analysis and prevention, 34(4), 457-464. Choi, J., Kim, S., Min, D., & Lee, D. (2016). Human‐centered designs, characteristics of urban streets, and pedestrian perceptions. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 50, 120-137. Braun, R., & Roddin, M. (1978). Quantifying the benefits of separating pedestrians and vehicles. NCHRP Report. Kumandang, E. M., & Tufail, D. N. (2022). Planning Pedestrian Paths for Trade and Service Areas of Balikpapan City with the Walkability Concept. PENA TEKNIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik. Forsyth, A., & Southworth, M. (2008). Cities Afoot—Pedestrians, Walkability and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 13, 1-3. Darmawan, A. M., & Rahmi, D. (2021). Quality of Walkability in Peunayong, Banda Aceh. Built Environment Studies. Knoop, V., & Daganzo, C. (2018). The Effect of Crosswalks on Traffic Flow. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 18. Huybers, S., Van Houten, R., & Malenfant, J. (2004). Reducing conflicts between motor vehicles and pedestrians: the separate and combined effects of pavement markings and a sign prompt. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 37(4), 445-456. Roddin, M. (1981). A Manual to Determine Benefits of Separating Pedestrians and Vehicles. NCHRP Report. Noise reduction due to increase of vegetation References Biocca, M., Gallo, P., Di Loreto, G., Imperi, G., Pochi, D., & Fornaciari, L. (2019). Noise attenuation provided by hedges. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. Ow, L., & Ghosh, S. (2017). Urban cities and road traffic noise: Reduction through vegetation. Applied Acoustics, 120, 15-20. Schäffer, B., Brink, M., Schlatter, F., Vienneau, D., & Wunderli, J. (2020). Residential green is associated with reduced annoyance to road traffic and railway noise but increased annoyance to aircraft noise exposure. Environment International, 143, 105885. Zhao, N., Prieur, J., Liu, Y., Kneeshaw, D., Morasse Lapointe, E., Paquette, A., Zinszer, K., Dupras, J., Villeneuve, P., Rainham, D., Lavigne, É., Chen, H., van den Bosch, M., Oiamo, T., & Smargiassi, A. (2021). Tree characteristics and environmental noise in complex urban settings - A case study from Montreal, Canada. Environmental Research, 111887. Grozeva, M. (2023). An optimised design for transport noise pollution reduction in the children's area and recreation spots. Agricultural Sciences. Skärbäck, E. (2007). Urban forests as compensation measures for infrastructure development. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 279-285. Francis, C. D., Kleist, N. J., Ortega, C. P., & Cruz, A. (2012). Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2727-2735. Radosavljević, J., Vukadinović, A., Vasović, D., & Petković, A. (2015). Attenuation of Road Traffic Noise by Vegetation in Urban Spaces. Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie, 318-326. Aylor, D. (1972). Noise Reduction by Vegetation and Ground. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 197-205. Liu, L., Han, B., Tan, D., Wu, D., & Shu, C. (2023). The Value of Ecosystem Traffic Noise Reduction Service Provided by Urban Green Belts: A Case Study of Shenzhen. Land. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A., & Öhrström, E. (2007). Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 115-126. De Carvalho, R. M., & Szlafsztein, C. (2019). Urban vegetation loss and ecosystem services: The influence on climate regulation and noise and air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 245, 844-852. Newport, J., Shorthouse, D., & Manning, A. (2014). The effects of light and noise from urban development on biodiversity: Implications for protected areas in Australia. Ecological Management and Restoration, 15, 204-214.

What We Offer.

01

Bioplanning Deep Dive and Workshop

Learn the details of Bioplanning and how it can support your needs in two hours private exclusive two hours workshop tailored to your practice's.

02

Bioplanning Project Consulting

Fractional hiring of the specialist from our network to support urban planning and development project in accordance with Bioplanning principles.

Comparative Feasibility Studies Driven by Local Context for Municipalities, Land Owners, and Developers

03

Discover the transformative potential of your community with our Comparative Feasibility Study, showcasing how Bioplanning’s innovative urban design can create a more resilient, sustainable, and vibrant future.

full sequence.gif

baseline report

A comprehensive assessment of current urban conditions and baseline metrics.

public dissemination materials

Visual aids, presentations, and reports for stakeholder engagement.

bioplanned community virtual simulation model

An interactive, 3D model showcasing the proposed bioplanned cellular community.

policy recommendations

Guidelines and strategies for implementing Bioplanning principles in future urban development projects.

comparative analysis report

Detailed analysis comparing current country climate risk profile, crime rates, and more with bioplanned community perfomance projections.

Key Metrics Showcasing Social, Economic, and Ecological Benefits:

Dark-Background

transportation and mobility

Dark Background

public health

Dark-Background

urban reconstruction

Dark-Background

decarbonization

Dark Background

biodiversity

Dark-Background

policy and standards

Bioplanning Principles.

An introduction to Bioplanning by Dror Benshetrit at TEDxAmazonia, November 2023

Founding Members.

Bioplanning is the culmination of 6 years of research conducted by Supernature Labs, in partnership with industry-leading experts. The Bioplanning Institute is supported by a multidisciplinary team of experts in sustainability, design, and urban planning. Our founding members bring diverse expertise, guiding our mission to research, develop, and promote Bioplanning. Their collective knowledge helps address the climate crisis through sustainable construction and development.

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.50.55 PM.png

Dror Benshetrit

Visionary Designer & Futurist, Founder of Supernature Labs

foto-rob-2_edited.jpg

Robert Muggah

Digital, Green, Safe Cities. Igarapé Institute, Bioverse, SecDev

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.55.24 PM.png

Executive Director, Data & Knowledge Hub ,Healthy Urban Living

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.56.14 PM.png

Astrid Wurdig

Visionary Architecture Management

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.51.06 PM.png

Davi Lemos

Regenerative Systems Specialist, Supernature Labs

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.54.13 PM.png

Dr. Hila Oren

Geographer, Smart Cities and Placemaking

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.53.10 PM.png

Indrani Pal-Chaudhuri

Filmmaker & Anthropology

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.56.36 PM.png

Winka Dubbeldam

Design Leader & Academic, Founder of Archi-Tectonics

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.55.51 PM.png

Urban and Regional Planning

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.53.44 PM.png

Thomas Ermacora

Guest Curator & Community Futurist

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.53.37 PM.png

Bruce Mau

Massive Change, Publishing & Education Partner

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.54.06 PM.png

Biodiversity by Design Chartered Scientist

Screenshot 2024-05-17 at 10.54.20 PM.png

Emerging Transport, Mobility

Key Collaborators.

The Bioplanning Institute, through its established nonprofit-corporate partnership with Supernature Labs, collaborates with leading experts in urban research and planning, environmental assessment, architectural and urban design, bio-economic development, growth strategy, and other related fields.

Our Book.

Bioplanning: A New Design Discipline is the Bioplanning Institute’s introductory publication containing the Bioplanning Design Manual along with a series of essays written by our remarkable network of subject matter experts. The publication delves into the ecological, social, community, and economic benefits of the Bioplanning approach.

Free_Book_Mockup_3 copy.jpg

Sign up for purchasing & get the first chapters now

Join The Movement.

The Bioplanning Institute offers a variety of ways to be involved:

Independent Research

Individuals interested in advancing Bioplanning through independent research.

Government

National and municipal entities interested in developing urban feasibility studies.

Strategic Alliances

Corporations, NGOs, and other individuals interested in strategic alliances

Other

To learn more about opportunities to work together please contact us at: info@bioplanninginstitute.org

Academia

Urban Design or relevant departments interested in studio creation.

Talent

Multidisciplinary talent interested in co-creating a productized system offering

Speaking Engagements

Conferences and corporations interested in keynote presentations.

Private Sector

Corporations interested in advancing research on a specific subject mater.

Real Estate Development

Entities interested in exploring Bioplanning as a design alternative for land development.

Philanthropy

Donations and contributions to the establishment of local Bioplanning Institutes.

bottom of page